By using cash, you only spend what you have, eliminating the risk of overdraft fees. It’s a straightforward way to avoid accumulating debt and keeps you from spending money you don't actually possess. In the U.S, overdraft fees can reach up to $35 per ...

The Financial Secret Your Bank Doesn't Want You to Know

The proposal builds on the Biden administration's efforts to eliminate junk fees and promote competition. At present, a financial advisor may be paid by the saver or by the firm that makes the investment product that is being recommended, the Biden administration said in a statement .

Biden's New Retirement Adviser Proposal Targets 'Junk Fees'

The Arizona Republic is seeking nearly $690,000 in legal fees from the state Senate and Cyber Ninjas after a two-year public records fight over documents from the so-called "audit" of the Maricopa County 2020 election. The news organization also has agreed ...

Republic seeks almost $690K in legal fees, agrees to settle Cyber Ninjas records case

Q Total Notional Volume on LODAS Increases 80%OVERLAND PARK, Kan., Nov. 1, 2023 /PRNewswire/ -- LODAS Markets, operator of the fourth-largest

LODAS Markets Cuts Trading Fees for NAV REITs, Executes BREIT Trade Just 4.5% below NAV

Online dating giant Match Group has dropped a closely watched antitrust lawsuit against Google’s app store, the two companies said Tuesday, days before a trial set to begin in San Francisco federal court.

Tinder owner Match Group settles antitrust claims against Google’s app store

A special investigation by the state auditor’s office has found a former state employee failed to deposit thousands of dollars in fees and taxes and received unauthorized gifts, including ring-side access to an event in Denver.

Investigation finds State of Iowa employee accepted gifts, failed to deposit license fees

However, there are some important differences, from fees to financial services to research resources, each of which could impact your customer experience. If you’re interested in getting financial advice, consulting a fiduciary financial advisor can be a ...

Vanguard vs. Fidelity vs. Schwab

To kick off the partnership, Bounty will be attending Best Friend Animal Society's Super Adoption event in Los Angeles, CA November 4 and November 5 along with award-winning host, best-selling author and actress, Maria Menounos.

Bounty® is Coming to the Rescue by Picking Up Pet Messes (and Adoption Fees) This November

Where a plaintiff files suit under the Freedom of Information Act, they may recover attorney fees and costs under section 11(i) of FOIA even if they did not receive court-ordered relief so long as their suit caused the defendant to provide the requested ...

FOIA — attorney fees and costs

Get the most recent info and news about fees on HackerNoon, where 10k+ technologists publish stories for 4M+ monthly readers.

fees

Ever since MEXC Global announced it was slashing maker and taker fees on the platform, the exchange has seen renewed growth, mirroring the positive turnaround seen in the wider cryptocurrency market. The fees to trade spot and futures markets on MEXC Global have both dropped to zero for maker fees, and 0.02% for futures taker fees, representing some of the lowest and most competitive rates worldwide for crypto investors. “This is great news for new and experienced crypto investors. We’ve listened to our customers and we want to provide them with the most competitive prices we can to help encourage their participation in this growing market,” Andrew Weiner, VP of MEXC Global said. “Lower rates mean people are much more likely to invest. This is a boost for individual investors, and more widely for the whole market. MEXC Global is the simplest to use and most customer-friendly cryptocurrency exchange available. As a leader in the space, we believe lowering fees is a simple way to boost engagement and investment.” The news comes as the market is bouncing back, and MEXC's business growth and increased trading volume are testaments to its reliability and efficiency. There are a number of reasons people are turning to MEXC Global, which trades around , but one that is particularly attractive is that new investors are drawn to MEXC’s low fees and extremely user-friendly interface that makes the exchange quick and easy to use, and means they can save more money to invest. $2.1bn per day in futures volume is dedicated to continuously upgrading its technology and optimizing its products. As of March 3rd, MEXC's perpetual futures liquidity is ranked No.1 in the market, supporting over 160 mainstream trading pairs in futures and 60 trading pairs in spots, with smaller price differences and lower trading costs. MEXC In an environment where retail investors are looking to save as much money as possible, low fees provide an attractive option, and offer a strong route to wider recovery for everyone. For more information, visit: www.mexc.com About MEXC MEXC is the world's leading cryptocurrency trading platform, providing one-stop cryptocurrency trading services for spot, ETF, futures, Staking, NFT Index, and more. MEXC currently serves more than 10 million users worldwide and embraces the philosophy of "Users first, MEXC's Changing for you". Visit the and for more information, and follow and . website blog MEXC Global M-Ventures

MEXC Global’s Record Low Fees Boosts Crypto Market Recovery

Las tarifas bajas récord de MEXC Global impulsan la recuperación del criptomercado

Les frais record de MEXC Global stimulent la reprise du marché de la cryptographie

एमईएक्ससी ग्लोबल का रिकॉर्ड कम शुल्क क्रिप्टो मार्केट रिकवरी को बढ़ावा देता है

MEXC グローバルの記録的な低手数料が暗号市場の回復を後押し

Taxas baixas recordes da MEXC Global impulsionam a recuperação do mercado cripto

Mức phí thấp kỷ lục của MEXC Global thúc đẩy phục hồi thị trường tiền điện tử

MEXC Global 创纪录的低费用推动加密市场复苏

Bitmex calculators return eroneous calculations: A position size with high leverage,  without recognizing the fees impact!   The loss will be severely superior to your expected trading risk! So, the risk reaward is  completely wrong,  you can easily lose more than win on every trade and liquidate your capital without understanding! It's sure Arthur agrees... Calcmex return the maximal position size assuming the type of input and output expected. In the potential loss are included your trading loss ( ) and your tradings fees ( ) PnL entry and exit, maker or taker Check this in the picture example: Trading loss is 93,89$ Entry fees: -3.05$ ( and Exit fees:  9.15$ this is a maker entry) So total fees are: 6.10$ the total loss is 93,89$+6,10$ = 99,99$ wich ( of correspond really with the trading risk 1% $10 000) == Steps == Go on and Calmex choose the pair you trade XBTUSD ETHUSD BCHUSD Others in construction You must input your money management and technical trading parameters: Input your trading budget either in $ or xbt ( your total  dedicated trading amount) Input your trading risk ( the trading budget % losses accepted if stop loss hitted) Input your entry level Input the stop loss level ( ) the smaller is the entry stop loss distance, the bigger is your trading power Input the target level Switch buttons if you intend to enter, exit in maker mode Press "Enter" or LOAD button Calcmex provides results in $ and Xbt: Your calculated position size The leverage needed The risk reward fees inclued (potential gain to risk loss ratio) The potentiel gain fees included The breakeven fees inclued (exit level without loss or profit) The risk loss fees inclued (%trading budget risk) Calcmex provides calcul verification, look at the entry fees impact: On the position size, profit, breakeven and the most important : Riskreward! Warnings : Don't use calculators not including trading fees in calculs: impossible correct money management especially with leverage! You can trade on Bitmex if you're Ok with your calculated riskreward (>1 is better) I hope these tips will enhance your performance, share with all and don't waste anymore time or money! Also published at https://medium.com/calcmex/calcul-your-bitmex-trading-position-size-fees-inclued-for-a-correct-money-management-edf1c9aba896

Calculate Bitmex Trading Position Size (Fees included) For Better Money Management 

Analysis of transaction fees has long been overlooked in the area, with the first papers in the academic literature being published from 2014 (Houy) onwards. blockchain It has still not been a research priority considering that only a few papers have been dedicated to this field. But transaction fees should not be neglected for at least two reasons. The first one relates to their importance in maintaining security incentives in a Proof-of-Work context. The second reason pertains to the very nature of the economic relationship between users, miners, and the protocol itself, as we will see below. As of today, the block reward is sufficient to keep miners’ incentives aligned: they earn enough money to maintain the network secure. However, the way transaction fees are designed is critical when the block reward tends toward zero, or, as we will see, when the network has a large throughput. We provide in this article a brief literature review, and we also describe our view of a possible design for an efficient transaction market. In Bitcoin, transaction fees are set by users. Any user can theoretically set the fee at zero, knowing that her transaction will probably be delayed if others choose a positive value for their fees. Indeed, being rational agents, miners will always prioritize the transactions with the highest fees. Transactions that are verified but not yet processed in the coming block (i.e. confirmed) are put together in a ‘waiting room’ called the mempool. Since each block has a limited size, users thus compete for space (Huberman et al., 2017; Dimitri, 2019) in each block, so that the fees reach an equilibrium price for each time-interval. Transactions that are not processed are left in the mempool, waiting for the next blocks to be validated by miners. However, Bitcoin-like blockchains do not come without flaws when viewed from a transaction fee perspective. Firstly, there is no priority given to the transaction (Aune et al., 2017) like in any normal queuing system based on standard “first-come, first-served” service delivery. Priority is advertised by users with by proposing a higher than average transaction fee. Miners usually just pick the transactions that advertise the highest fee. Secondly, fees may be too low to cover the losses incurred by mining pools, particularly when the block reward tends to zero (Carlsten et al., 2016; Huberman et al., 2017). Following the same logic, fees might become too high for a day-to-day user of the network to compensate fully for his or her loss of the block reward (Easley et al., 2019). Therefore, the small block size imposes a high risk of congestion in the system, when transactions are flowing into the mempool more rapidly than they are validated by miners. Waiting time leads to congestion in the network, thus to higher fees. On the one hand, congestion of the increases the incentives for miners to allocate their computing power to particular users on that blockchain, and therefore undermine consistent security. On the other hand, it creates delays in transaction processing which may deter some users from using the network at all. In the long run, Bitcoin might need high transaction fees in order to function both properly and securely (Lavi et al., 2017), an outcome which may tend to defeat the purpose of a global payment system. In this context, studying the incentives behind PoW networks’ transaction fees might be important for optimizing future designs. Letting users choose their own transaction fees might not be an optimal solution. Is there an equilibrium price for which these fees are sufficient to ensure the security of the network, regardless of how much miners are at that time earning from minting new coins? In current PoW blockchains, the answer is clearly no. Block size is limiting the number of transactions that can be processed for each time-interval. In sum, users shouldn’t be allowed to privately set their own fee, in order to avoid a typical free-rider problem (Auer, 2019). Fees are set up individually, while transactions are bulked together into the next block. This ensures the same level of security for all transactions in the block, regardless of the level of the fees taken individually. Put it simply, user A has an incentive to “free-ride”, i.e. posting lower fees until his or her transaction is included within the block, hence piggy-backing on other users who advertise higher transaction fees. The direct consequence is a decrease in the system’s security, if everyone behaves like user A, by reducing transaction fees to the point that it is no longer economically viable for miners to confirm transactions. We can solve most of these issues by I) having a much higher throughput than any other PoW blockchain-based networks, and II) adopting a different approach to transaction fees, in order to reap the full benefits of network effects. We will next consider the second point. Even if having a high throughput decentralized transaction network solves the scalability trilemma, it brings about other problems. In most papers arguing for a change in PoW consensus protocols, auction theory is used to optimize the transaction fees (Lavi et al., 2017). Another approach is to link fees with the amount of storage space secured by miners (Chepurnoy et al., 2019). Although these solutions could work in environments where users compete for block space, it is unlikely that they could work in ours. Indeed, our network’s ability to process a lot of transactions would push transaction fees towards zero, if fees were to be selected through any type of auctions. If left to market forces, users, knowing that their transaction will be processed, would collectively choose an optimal fee that tends toward zero, as any game theoretic analysis would suggest. Therefore, auction-style transaction fees need to be ruled out. Another point to consider is the influence of cross-side network effects. The protocol can be viewed as a platform where supply and demand for global transactions meet. Miners (i.e. supply) want high transaction fees, while users want low ones. This conflict of interests must be reflected not only in the price, but also within its structure (Rochet & Tirole, 2006)[1]. This is a well-known problem in so-called two-sided markets. As we already mentioned, in Bitcoin’s present design, users are more or less free to determine their own fees . Bitcoin Competing for block space and the risk of free-riding network Possible solutions and the road ahead In the current system, interests are not aligned, since users will tend to free-ride, thus negatively affecting the overall security of the protocol.  In our view, the fee should follow a more market-based mechanism. The price function fluctuates according to the supply and demand of transactions, without the user being able to set up a lower fee, provided that he is ready to wait for his transaction to being processed. Behind the curtains, the setup is quite complex, but in practice, it turned out to be very user-friendly. In order to better understand the price structure of the on-chain transaction fees, we need to analyze the price structure of these types of networks. In our case, we follow a queuing game (Kendall, 1953; Bhat, 2015) in a two-sided market (Rochet & Tirole, 2006). We need a proper price structure, in order to incentivize both users and miners on the network. As it has been argued, congestion should be lower, as compared to congestion on existing PoW blockchains. However, even with a large throughput, it is likely that some congestion will occur, and that some delay costs will partially remain (Huberman et al., 2017). Also, taken independently, one shard can theoretically be overloaded at some point in its history. We propose a market-based mechanism, in order to reflect these situations. The dynamic pricing adjusts transaction fees in order to respond to supply and demand fluctuations. In the event of network congestion, surge pricing can solve some economic problems, by smoothing out the demand curve (Cohen et al., 2016). This function should ensure a market-based approach toward transaction fees, an approach in which surge pricing for reducing delay costs plays a central role. And exactly like the system used within Uber, the user can “tip” the mining pool, thereby demonstrating that he has higher delay costs, and that  he wants his transaction to be processed as soon as possible. The framework will optimize the waiting time for the its users, while guaranteeing miners a minimal fee, even when competition for block space is low. In other words, the floor price should at least cover the costs per transaction incurred by the miners. Such economics are used by ride-hailing apps such as Uber or Lift, and have proven to be quite efficient. Written by Lucas Leger . REFERENCES: Auer, R. (2019). Beyond the doomsday economics of “Proof-of-work” in cryptocurrencies, BIS Working Papers No. 765. Aune, R. T., Krellenstein, A., O’Hara, M., & Slama, O. (2017). Footprints on a Blockchain: Trading and Information Leakage in Distributed Ledgers, The Journal of Trading, 12(3), 5–13. Bhat, U. N. (2015). An Introduction to Queueing Theory: Modeling and Analysis in Applications, Springer Second Edition. Caillaud, B., and Jullien, B. (2003). Chicken & Egg: Competition among Intermediation Service Providers, RAND Journal of Economics, 34(2): 309–28. Carlsten, M., Kalodner, H., Weinberg, S. M., and Narayanan, A. (2016). On the Instability of Bitcoin Without the Block Reward, Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security - CCS’16. Chepurnoy, A., Kharin, V., and Meshkov, D. (2019). A Systematic Approach To Cryptocurrency Fees, in A. Zohar, I. Eyal, V. Teague, J. Clark, A. Bracciali, F. Pintore, M. Sala (Eds.) Financial Cryptography and Data Security FC 2018 International Workshops, BITCOIN, VOTING, and WTSC, Nieuwpoort, Curaçao, March 2, 2018, Revised Selected Papers Berlin: Springer 19-30. Cohen, P., Hahn, R., Hall, J., Levitt, S., and Metcalfe, R. (2016). Using Big Data to Estimate Consumer Surplus: The Case of Uber, NBER Working Paper No. 22627. Dimitri, N. (2019). Transaction Fees, Block Size Limit, and Auctions in Bitcoin. Ledger, 4. Easley, D., O’Hara, M., Basu, S. (2019). From Mining to Markets: The Evolution of Bitcoin Transaction Fees. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol 134 (1), pp 91-109. Houy, N. (2014). The Economics of Bitcoin Transaction Fees. SSRN Working Paper. Huberman, G., Leshno, J. and Moellemi, C. (2017). Monopoly without a monopolist: an economic analysis of the Bitcoin payment system, Columbia Business School Research Papers no 17-92. Kendall, D.G. (1953), Stochastic processes occurring in the theory of queues and their analysis by the method of imbedded Markov chains, Annales of Mathematical Statistics, 24(3), 338-354. Lavi, R., Sattath, O., and Zohar, A. (2017). Redesigning Bitcoin's fee market, arXiv:1709.08881 Rochet, J-C., and Tirole, J. (2006). Two-Sided Markets: A Progress Report, RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3): 645–67. [1] Transaction fees can be viewed as a two-sided market, where the incentives of the miners are co-dependent on the users’ response on price structure. As put by Rochet & Tirole (2006): “We define a two-sided market as one in which the volume of transactions between end-users depends on the structure and not only on the overall level of the fees charged by the platform. A platform’s usage or variable charges impact the two sides’ willingness to trade once on the platform, and thereby their net surpluses from potential interactions; the platforms’ membership or fixed charges in turn condition the end-users’ presence on the platform.” We want to minimize transaction fees to attract most users and at the same time to maximize the speed at which transactions are processed by miners, which require high transaction fees. It is a typical two-sided (Caillaud & Jullien, 2003; Rochet & Tirole, 2006) pricing setup. If transaction fees are too high, users go on other networks, too low, miners would not take of the transactions right away. In a nutshell, we need to set the price to incentivize opposite behaviors, so as to internalize cross-side network effects.

On-chain Transaction Fees: Why Economics Matter? 

At Upvest, we've secured almost €900k Euro in project funding from the Investitionsbank Berlin (IBB) and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) as part of the IBB ProFit program. The funding is used to further support the development of Upvest’s transaction fee recommendation/estimation engine. The IBB only selects a handful of startups each year, and Upvest was among those selected in 2020. Fee estimation on Ethereum is risky and cost-inefficient Transaction fees are a complex topic that platforms have to deal with when building applications on Ethereum. On the decentralized network, the execution speed of a transaction is dependent on the network traffic at a given time, as well as on the transaction fee, which is sent along with the transaction. Thus, setting a fixed fee for every transaction will likely result in an overfunding or underfunding of the transactions. Overfunded transactions quickly add up in terms of cost, especially when the amount of transactions sent is very high. Underfunded transactions, on the other hand, come with the risk of being dropped and never included in mined blocks. Underfunded transactions get stuck in the mempool, and it requires signing another transaction to replace the underfunded one. As of today, existing fee estimation approaches are simplistic and do not come with uptime guarantees or enterprise support. Fee estimation neural network Upvest developed a fee recommendation engine and high availability API powered by a continuously evolving machine learning model. The engine is constantly collecting real-time network signals from numerous independent data sources, including for example the number of unconfirmed transactions or the number of active miners, which are then used to trained the neural network. Currently deployed model has been trained with Ethereum network signals gathered over a period of one month. The initial benchmark results against the competing fee recommendation solutions promises crucial performance improvements of around 18% - that's significantly cheaper fees for the same transaction performance. Why should I use it? Upvest fee recommendation engine is designed for startups and companies that are executing a large number of transactions on the network. These companies are dependent on a meaningful fee recommendation system to optimize their operating costs. Moreover, the transaction execution speed is optimized while locking up capital is avoided entirely. It is relevant to highlight that these benefits gain importance for an increasing transaction count and/or transaction volume. Upvest offers the service in the form of an easy to use API, which does not require any blockchain specific knowledge. You can achieve the execution speed that you need without worrying about fees. How can I participate and get access? If you are company or a startup working with Ethereum transactions and would like to try the fee recommendation API, apply using this form or write to us directly to get access to fee estimation private beta. We are very excited to hear your feedback. Learn more about the project in the technical blog post and fee estimation product page. At Upvest , we've secured almost €900k Euro in project funding from the Investitionsbank Berlin (IBB) and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) as part of the IBB ProFit program. The funding is used to further support the development of Upvest’s transaction fee recommendation/estimation engine. Upvest The IBB only selects a handful of startups each year, and Upvest was among those selected in 2020. Upvest Fee estimation on Ethereum is risky and cost-inefficient Transaction fees are a complex topic that platforms have to deal with when building applications on Ethereum. On the decentralized network, the execution speed of a transaction is dependent on the network traffic at a given time, as well as on the transaction fee, which is sent along with the transaction. Thus, setting a fixed fee for every transaction will likely result in an overfunding or underfunding of the transactions. Overfunded transactions quickly add up in terms of cost, especially when the amount of transactions sent is very high. Underfunded transactions, on the other hand, come with the risk of being dropped and never included in mined blocks. Underfunded transactions get stuck in the mempool, and it requires signing another transaction to replace the underfunded one. As of today, existing fee estimation approaches are simplistic and do not come with uptime guarantees or enterprise support. Fee estimation neural network Upvest developed a fee recommendation engine and high availability API powered by a continuously evolving machine learning model. The engine is constantly collecting real-time network signals from numerous independent data sources, including for example the number of unconfirmed transactions or the number of active miners, which are then used to trained the neural network. Currently deployed model has been trained with Ethereum network signals gathered over a period of one month. The initial benchmark results against the competing fee recommendation solutions promises crucial performance improvements of around 18% - that's significantly cheaper fees for the same transaction performance. Why should I use it? Upvest fee recommendation engine is designed for startups and companies that are executing a large number of transactions on the network. These companies are dependent on a meaningful fee recommendation system to optimize their operating costs. Moreover, the transaction execution speed is optimized while locking up capital is avoided entirely. It is relevant to highlight that these benefits gain importance for an increasing transaction count and/or transaction volume. Upvest offers the service in the form of an easy to use API, which does not require any blockchain specific knowledge. You can achieve the execution speed that you need without worrying about fees. How can I participate and get access? If you are company or a startup working with Ethereum transactions and would like to try the fee recommendation API, apply using this form or write to us directly to get access to fee estimation private beta. We are very excited to hear your feedback. apply using this form write to us directly Learn more about the project in the technical blog post and fee estimation product page . technical blog post fee estimation product page

About Our €900k Fundraise to Solve the Ethereum Transaction Fee Problem

How investing in shares/custom tokens of popular exchanges could result in growth of asset value as the exchanges mature and increase their user base & volume When everyone is trying to understand what’s a Blockchain, what’s a Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple and suddenly the new ones like IOTA, Cardano — there’s a hidden gem that’s sitting there which could be a better investment. Exchange Specific Tokens — Coins or Custom tokens by Exchanges which serve the purpose of saving transaction fees. We’ll call them as ESTs :) This is an observation & knowledge gathered from few other educational sources and not an investment advice. Growth of Binance Very young cryptocurrency trading platform called , which started just few months ago has now claimed it’s top slot as the world’s largest crypto exchange by 24hr volume. It’s all because of astounding marketing, new kind of business model and aggressive coin listings. now features a lot of coins which has greater potential in terms of project capability and not listed anywhere on Bittrex, Poloniex. This gives a great advantage. Binance Binance Binance The content of this blog is not intended as investment advice. it’s just a _how to tutorial. S_howing my portfolio and using examples, purely as a record of what I have done and does not constitute advice on whether a currency should be bought or sold. Along with this, another crucial advantage of is having it’s own coin called BNB — which is solely used to pay transaction fees on each trade. Binance Trading fees & BNB Trading fees is painful but cannot be avoided! But what if trading platform incentivizes people to use a instead of your alt-coin & give a 50% discount on fees when you use this That’s for you. custom token custom token. BNB Given this advantage, people have been buying BNB tokens to avoid half of their transaction fee — which according to supply demand economics has taken BNB’s price 50x since it’s release. So if you are a smart investor — buying just this BNB and just holding it would also appreciate your assets as the volume of trading grows on the platform. Since has already proven with it’s marketing strategies and growth vector from it’s inception — I think it would work out well. Binance Steps up the game Kucoin Now another exchange which came up with very cool interface and very usable experience, takes this a step further with their own token, . charges a 0.1% fee from every trade, both from the maker and taker, which comes up to 0.2% fee’s per trade(someone sells and someone buys). Kucoin , KCS — Kucoin Shares Kucoin Big bang offer from KuCoin is that they pay 50% of this fee (0.1% per trade) to KCS holders! This shows a back of the envelope calculations for investing $10,000. BNB token from Binance shows the supply demand characteristics of such custom tokens and also the volumetric increase on exchange will also lead to increase in your dividends and thus the holding assets’ value. article Kucoin How to Buy KCS — Shares Kucoin Register on Coinbase, buy Ethereum (or bitcoin — but transaction fees would be high and transfer time is much more compared to Ethereum). Transfer your Ethereum to your ETH deposit address on Exchange. KuCoin click on deposit to see your ethereum address and send from coinbase to that address 3. Select KCS/ETH pair to view the KCS/ETH trading view 4. On the trading view of KCS/ETH pair, at bottom right hand corner, you will see the buy and sell boxes, where you can select the price at which you want to buy, enter the amount of KCS you want to buy and click on Buy Once you click on Buy, your order will be placed. This is a limit order, so whenever your specified price is hit, it will buy KCS and you can see them in your balances. Numbers and Amounts used in this article are for educational purposes, I do not specify the amount you should be investing. It’s your own decision. Given the volatile nature of cryptocurrency space, you can only be investing what you can lose. The content of this blog is not intended as . it’s just a _how to tutorial. S_howing my portfolio and using examples, purely as a record of what I have done and does not constitute advice on whether a currency should be bought or sold. You should always do your own research , make your own decisions and be comfortable with the risks before making an investment. Investing in volatile cryptocurrencies involves an element of risk: prices of these currencies go up and down, (often in a manner that seems irrational). investment advice (DYOR) (MYOD)

Forget referrals on Binance & Kucoin, Check out these paycheck coins: BNB, KCS

CAYMAN ISLANDS, Cayman Islands, December 4th, 2024/Chainwire/--Metaplex, the blockchain protocol used to create virtually every token, memecoin, and NFT on Solana, saw record-breaking protocol fees in November, fueled by a surge in digital asset creation on Solana. Rise in Solana Token Creation Drives Record Protocol Growth As the protocol behind virtually all token creation on Solana, Metaplex has emerged as a primary beneficiary of the extraordinary surge in digital asset creation on the Solana network. This exponential level of activity, encompassing everything from memecoins to AI tokens and NFTs, directly contributes to Metaplex's protocol fees. This increased protocol fee generation has in turn funded record-breaking $MPLX token purchases for the Metaplex DAO. Since June 2024, 50% of the prior month’s protocol fees and a portion of the historical fees have been allocated to funding $MPLX token purchases for contribution to the DAO. In November 2024, this culminated in 12k SOL worth of $MPLX purchases — equivalent to approximately $3 million at current prices, marking a substantial 58% increase month-over-month and signifying the largest monthly $MPLX token purchases to date. Building on this momentum, Metaplex's November protocol fees hit an all-time high of $3.5 million, setting the stage for even larger allocations for $MPLX purchases in December. Record-Breaking Metaplex Protocol Metrics in November November's protocol activity shattered previous records across multiple metrics: Metaplex saw extraordinary growth in fungible token creation, with 1.4M new tokens minted — marking a 56% increase month-over-month compared to the previous all-time high in October 2024 and a new monthly record. This represented 94% of all Token Metadata assets created, driven primarily by memecoin activity on platforms such as Pump.fun.
Metaplex Core, the next generation NFT standard, demonstrated significant adoption with a new all-time high of 354k assets created, driven by expanded use cases made possible due to the standard’s flexible design.
User engagement metrics surged as the number of unique wallets interacting with the Metaplex protocol reached 879k — a 34% increase from October and a new all-time high. The protocol's total collector base expanded to nearly 60 million unique wallets, growing by over 860k in November alone. About the Metaplex Protocol Metaplex is the leading decentralized protocol on Solana and SVM, providing tools and programs for developers and creators to build decentralized applications that use digital assets. With a growing user base and a commitment to innovation, Metaplex is empowering the next wave of decentralized finance and commerce. About the Metaplex Foundation The Metaplex Foundation is a Cayman Islands non-profit organization dedicated to supporting the development and growth of the Metaplex Protocol. By providing open-source tools and resources, the Foundation empowers developers, creators, and users worldwide to participate in a decentralized and inclusive digital economy. Website: https://www.metaplex.com/ X: https://x.com/metaplex Discord: https://discord.com/invite/6FaDSP2zms Contact Marketing Dan Forgd dan@forgd.com This story was distributed as a release by Chainwire under HackerNoon’s Business Blogging Program. Learn more about the program here CAYMAN ISLANDS, Cayman Islands, December 4th, 2024/Chainwire/--Metaplex, the blockchain protocol used to create virtually every token, memecoin, and NFT on Solana, saw record-breaking protocol fees in November, fueled by a surge in digital asset creation on Solana. Rise in Solana Token Creation Drives Record Protocol Growth As the protocol behind virtually all token creation on Solana, Metaplex has emerged as a primary beneficiary of the extraordinary surge in digital asset creation on the Solana network. This exponential level of activity, encompassing everything from memecoins to AI tokens and NFTs, directly contributes to Metaplex's protocol fees. This increased protocol fee generation has in turn funded record-breaking $MPLX token purchases for the Metaplex DAO. Since June 2024, 50% of the prior month’s protocol fees and a portion of the historical fees have been allocated to funding $MPLX token purchases for contribution to the DAO. In November 2024, this culminated in 12k SOL worth of $MPLX purchases — equivalent to approximately $3 million at current prices, marking a substantial 58% increase month-over-month and signifying the largest monthly $MPLX token purchases to date. Building on this momentum, Metaplex's November protocol fees hit an all-time high of $3.5 million, setting the stage for even larger allocations for $MPLX purchases in December. Record-Breaking Metaplex Protocol Metrics in November November's protocol activity shattered previous records across multiple metrics: Metaplex saw extraordinary growth in fungible token creation, with 1.4M new tokens minted — marking a 56% increase month-over-month compared to the previous all-time high in October 2024 and a new monthly record. This represented 94% of all Token Metadata assets created, driven primarily by memecoin activity on platforms such as Pump.fun. Metaplex Core, the next generation NFT standard, demonstrated significant adoption with a new all-time high of 354k assets created, driven by expanded use cases made possible due to the standard’s flexible design. User engagement metrics surged as the number of unique wallets interacting with the Metaplex protocol reached 879k — a 34% increase from October and a new all-time high. The protocol's total collector base expanded to nearly 60 million unique wallets, growing by over 860k in November alone. Metaplex saw extraordinary growth in fungible token creation, with 1.4M new tokens minted — marking a 56% increase month-over-month compared to the previous all-time high in October 2024 and a new monthly record. This represented 94% of all Token Metadata assets created, driven primarily by memecoin activity on platforms such as Pump.fun. Metaplex Core, the next generation NFT standard, demonstrated significant adoption with a new all-time high of 354k assets created, driven by expanded use cases made possible due to the standard’s flexible design. User engagement metrics surged as the number of unique wallets interacting with the Metaplex protocol reached 879k — a 34% increase from October and a new all-time high. The protocol's total collector base expanded to nearly 60 million unique wallets, growing by over 860k in November alone. About the Metaplex Protocol Metaplex is the leading decentralized protocol on Solana and SVM, providing tools and programs for developers and creators to build decentralized applications that use digital assets. With a growing user base and a commitment to innovation, Metaplex is empowering the next wave of decentralized finance and commerce. Metaplex Metaplex About the Metaplex Foundation The Metaplex Foundation is a Cayman Islands non-profit organization dedicated to supporting the development and growth of the Metaplex Protocol. By providing open-source tools and resources, the Foundation empowers developers, creators, and users worldwide to participate in a decentralized and inclusive digital economy. Website: https://www.metaplex.com/ https://www.metaplex.com/ https://www.metaplex.com/ X: https://x.com/metaplex https://x.com/metaplex https://x.com/metaplex Discord: https://discord.com/invite/6FaDSP2zms https://discord.com/invite/6FaDSP2zms https://discord.com/invite/6FaDSP2zms Contact Marketing Dan Forgd dan@forgd.com This story was distributed as a release by Chainwire under HackerNoon’s Business Blogging Program. Learn more about the program here This story was distributed as a release by Chainwire under HackerNoon’s Business Blogging Program. Learn more about the program here here here

Metaplex Protocol Achieves Record-Breaking Protocol Fees In November 2024

Metaplex ፕሮቶኮል በኖቬምበር 2024 ሪከርድ ሰባሪ የፕሮቶኮል ክፍያዎችን አሳክቷል።

بروتوكول ميتابليكس يحقق رسوم بروتوكول قياسية في نوفمبر 2024

মেটাপ্লেক্স প্রোটোকল 2024 সালের নভেম্বরে রেকর্ড-ব্রেকিং প্রোটোকল ফি অর্জন করে

Το Metaplex Protocol επιτυγχάνει χρεώσεις πρωτοκόλλου που σπάνε ρεκόρ τον Νοέμβριο του 2024

El protocolo Metaplex alcanza tarifas récord en noviembre de 2024

Metaplex Protocol postigao rekordne naknade za protokol u studenom 2024.

メタプレックス・プロトコルは2024年11月に記録破りのプロトコル手数料を達成

Protokol Metaplex Mencapai Yuran Protokol Pemecah Rekod Pada November 2024

Metaplex Protocole igera ku mafaranga yo gusenya inyandiko-mvugo mu Gushyingo 2024

Metaplex Protocol ทำลายสถิติค่าธรรมเนียมโปรโตคอลในเดือนพฤศจิกายน 2024

У листопаді 2024 року протокол Metaplex досяг рекордних зборів за протокол

IProtokholi yeMetaplex iPhumelela uMrhumo weProtokholi woKwaphula iRekhodi ngoNovemba wama-2024

The Center for Investigative Reporting Inc. v. OpenAI Court Filing, retrieved on June 27, 2024, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This part is 18 of 18. PRAYER FOR RELIEF Plaintiff seeks the following relief: (i) Either statutory damages or the total of Plaintiff’s damages and Defendants’ profits, to be elected by Plaintiff; (ii) An injunction requiring Defendants to remove all copies of the Registered Works from their training sets and any other repositories; (iii) An injunction requiring Defendants to remove all copies of Plaintiff’s copyrighted works from which author, title, copyright, or terms of use information was removed from their training sets and any other repositories; (iv) Attorney fees and costs. JURY DEMAND Plaintiff demands a jury trial. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, /s/ Stephen Stich Match Jonathan Loevy* Michael Kanovitz* Lauren Carbajal* Stephen Stich Match (No. 5567854) Matthew Topic* Thomas Kayes* Steven Art* LOEVY & LOEVY 311 North Aberdeen, 3rd Floor Chicago, IL 60607 312-243-5900 (p) 312-243-5902 (f) jon@loevy.com mike@loevy.com carbajal@loevy.com match@loevy.com matt@loevy.com *pro hac vice forthcoming June 27, 2024 About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.
This court case retrieved on June 27, 2024, motherjones.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. The Center for Investigative Reporting Inc. v. OpenAI Court Filing, retrieved on June 27, 2024, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This part is 18 of 18. The Center for Investigative Reporting Inc. v. OpenAI Court Filing, retrieved on June 27, 2024, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series . You can jump to any part in this filing here . This part is 18 of 18. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here PRAYER FOR RELIEF Plaintiff seeks the following relief: (i) Either statutory damages or the total of Plaintiff’s damages and Defendants’ profits, to be elected by Plaintiff; (ii) An injunction requiring Defendants to remove all copies of the Registered Works from their training sets and any other repositories; (iii) An injunction requiring Defendants to remove all copies of Plaintiff’s copyrighted works from which author, title, copyright, or terms of use information was removed from their training sets and any other repositories; (iv) Attorney fees and costs. JURY DEMAND Plaintiff demands a jury trial. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, /s/ Stephen Stich Match /s/ Stephen Stich Match Jonathan Loevy* Michael Kanovitz* Lauren Carbajal* Stephen Stich Match (No. 5567854) Matthew Topic* Thomas Kayes* Steven Art* LOEVY & LOEVY 311 North Aberdeen, 3rd Floor Chicago, IL 60607 312-243-5900 (p) 312-243-5902 (f) jon@loevy.com mike@loevy.com carbajal@loevy.com match@loevy.com matt@loevy.com *pro hac vice forthcoming June 27, 2024 About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case retrieved on June 27, 2024, motherjones.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case retrieved on June 27, 2024, motherjones.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. motherjones.com

CIR Seeks Statutory Damages, Injunctions, and Attorney Fees from OpenAI

Or Perelman, co-founder of Chromia, discusses the platform's innovative approach to blockchain technology, including its relational blockchain concept and elimination of direct gas fees. He shares insights on Chromia's development, partnerships, and vision for the future of blockchain adoption. Ishan Pandey: Hello Or Perelman, it's a pleasure to welcome you to our 'Behind the Startup' series. You have a notable history in the blockchain space, including being featured in TechCrunch's first article about Bitcoin and co-founding one of the earliest Bitcoin wallets. How did your early experiences in blockchain influence your journey at Chromia? Or Perelman: Thank you for having me, Ishan. My journey with Chromia really began from the same curiosity that drew me to Bitcoin early on. I like to keep an eye out for new technology, and then it always leads to the same question: “What can we build with it?”. Ishan Pandey: Chromia introduces innovative concepts like relational blockchain and eliminating direct gas fees for users. What inspired these unique features, and how do they address the limitations you observed in traditional blockchain technologies? Or Perelman: Chromia isn’t a fork of anything, but a new blockchain concept built from the ground up. The best thing about that is we could look at existing platforms and ask ourselves what we would want to do differently. The relational blockchain concept was inspired by traditional relational databases, which are excellent at handling complex queries and structured data. By integrating these concepts into a blockchain framework, we allow for more efficient data handling. Eliminating direct gas fees was driven by the need to improve user experience and adoption. Traditional gas fees can be a barrier, especially for new users. Ishan Pandey: Chromia’s model eliminates direct gas fees for users. How has this model, along with Chromia’s predictable weekly hosting fee structure, impacted both user adoption and developer engagement compared to traditional blockchain platforms? Or Perelman: When people hear about "no gas fees," it really grabs their attention and starts a conversation. When we designed the system, we began with a reordering of traditional blockchain economics. Chromia is still in its early stages, but I believe that in the long term, it gives us an advantage over other Layer-1s. The reason is that you can start using a Chromia based dapp and not even realize until later that you were using a blockchain! Ishan Pandey: Chromia has received investment from several notable VC groups. How have these partnerships influenced Chromia’s development and market strategy? Or Perelman: Having a well-developed network of partners, both in technology and investment, is crucial for success in Web3. The connections we’ve formed in the industry have been instrumental in integrating us into the larger crypto ecosystem. That said, we've also been selective, turning down some OTC investment offers. We have received help from our private investors and also new liquid funds who bought $CHR with regards to potential partnerships with external projects. Ishan Pandey: With Chromia’s mainnet recently launched, what are the immediate and long-term goals for the platform? How do you plan to expand the ecosystem? Or Perelman: For the next rest of the summer, we are refining some of our core components and completing the migration of our staking system from EVM to Chromia. From an ecosystem perspective, we have a very well developed gaming sector, and I think the most common perception of Chromia is that we are a ‘gaming chain’. While this is true, we are also a fully featured Layer-1 that can run all kinds of dapps. As the year progresses, we expect to see other areas like DeFi become more developed. Also, I can’t say too much but we are working on some new initiatives that will open up Chromia to a whole new range of use cases. Long-term, we are ambitious and plan to have a significant presence across multiple verticals. Ishan Pandey: As a pioneer in relational blockchain technology, how do you see Chromia influencing the broader blockchain industry in coming years? Or Perelman: Most blockchains, regardless of their scalability, struggle with handling complex data sets. Relational blockchain aims to address this and could establish a new standard for blockchains. Chromia is designed to be interoperable with Ethereum and other EVM chains, allowing projects on other chains to utilize our unique features. As more projects and developers recognize the benefits, we anticipate an increase in the adoption of the relational model. Ishan Pandey: Finally, where do you see the future of new technologies such as blockchain heading, and what strategies do you believe are crucial to promoting its widespread adoption? Or Perelman: I believe the most important step in promoting adoption is making blockchain more intuitive. This includes easier account handling, 'gas-free' transactions, and streamlining the onboarding process. While progress is being made, there's still a long way to go. At Chromia, we’re committed to contributing to this evolution and improving the user experience. Don’t forget to like and share the story! Vested Interest Disclosure: This author is an independent contributor publishing via our business blogging program. HackerNoon has reviewed the report for quality, but the claims herein belong to the author. #DYOR. Or Perelman, co-founder of Chromia , discusses the platform's innovative approach to blockchain technology, including its relational blockchain concept and elimination of direct gas fees. He shares insights on Chromia's development, partnerships, and vision for the future of blockchain adoption. Chromia Ishan Pandey: Hello Or Perelman, it's a pleasure to welcome you to our 'Behind the Startup' series. You have a notable history in the blockchain space, including being featured in TechCrunch's first article about Bitcoin and co-founding one of the earliest Bitcoin wallets. How did your early experiences in blockchain influence your journey at Chromia? Ishan Pandey: Hello Or Perelman, it's a pleasure to welcome you to our 'Behind the Startup' series. You have a notable history in the blockchain space, including being featured in TechCrunch's first article about Bitcoin and co-founding one of the earliest Bitcoin wallets. How did your early experiences in blockchain influence your journey at Chromia? Ishan Pandey: Hello Or Perelman, it's a pleasure to welcome you to our 'Behind the Startup' series. You have a notable history in the blockchain space, including being featured in TechCrunch's first article about Bitcoin and co-founding one of the earliest Bitcoin wallets. How did your early experiences in blockchain influence your journey at Chromia? Or Perelman: Thank you for having me, Ishan. My journey with Chromia really began from the same curiosity that drew me to Bitcoin early on. I like to keep an eye out for new technology, and then it always leads to the same question: “What can we build with it?”. Or Perelman: Ishan Pandey: Chromia introduces innovative concepts like relational blockchain and eliminating direct gas fees for users. What inspired these unique features, and how do they address the limitations you observed in traditional blockchain technologies? Ishan Pandey: Chromia introduces innovative concepts like relational blockchain and eliminating direct gas fees for users. What inspired these unique features, and how do they address the limitations you observed in traditional blockchain technologies? Ishan Pandey: Chromia introduces innovative concepts like relational blockchain and eliminating direct gas fees for users. What inspired these unique features, and how do they address the limitations you observed in traditional blockchain technologies? Or Perelman: Chromia isn’t a fork of anything, but a new blockchain concept built from the ground up. The best thing about that is we could look at existing platforms and ask ourselves what we would want to do differently. The relational blockchain concept was inspired by traditional relational databases, which are excellent at handling complex queries and structured data. By integrating these concepts into a blockchain framework, we allow for more efficient data handling. Eliminating direct gas fees was driven by the need to improve user experience and adoption. Traditional gas fees can be a barrier, especially for new users. Or Perelman: Ishan Pandey: Chromia’s model eliminates direct gas fees for users. How has this model, along with Chromia’s predictable weekly hosting fee structure, impacted both user adoption and developer engagement compared to traditional blockchain platforms? Ishan Pandey: Chromia’s model eliminates direct gas fees for users. How has this model, along with Chromia’s predictable weekly hosting fee structure, impacted both user adoption and developer engagement compared to traditional blockchain platforms? Ishan Pandey: Chromia’s model eliminates direct gas fees for users. How has this model, along with Chromia’s predictable weekly hosting fee structure, impacted both user adoption and developer engagement compared to traditional blockchain platforms? Or Perelman: When people hear about "no gas fees," it really grabs their attention and starts a conversation. When we designed the system, we began with a reordering of traditional blockchain economics. Chromia is still in its early stages, but I believe that in the long term, it gives us an advantage over other Layer-1s. The reason is that you can start using a Chromia based dapp and not even realize until later that you were using a blockchain! Or Perelman: Ishan Pandey: Chromia has received investment from several notable VC groups. How have these partnerships influenced Chromia’s development and market strategy? Ishan Pandey: Chromia has received investment from several notable VC groups. How have these partnerships influenced Chromia’s development and market strategy? Ishan Pandey: Chromia has received investment from several notable VC groups. How have these partnerships influenced Chromia’s development and market strategy? Or Perelman: Having a well-developed network of partners, both in technology and investment, is crucial for success in Web3. The connections we’ve formed in the industry have been instrumental in integrating us into the larger crypto ecosystem. That said, we've also been selective, turning down some OTC investment offers. We have received help from our private investors and also new liquid funds who bought $CHR with regards to potential partnerships with external projects. Or Perelman: Ishan Pandey: With Chromia’s mainnet recently launched, what are the immediate and long-term goals for the platform? How do you plan to expand the ecosystem? Ishan Pandey: With Chromia’s mainnet recently launched, what are the immediate and long-term goals for the platform? How do you plan to expand the ecosystem? Ishan Pandey: With Chromia’s mainnet recently launched, what are the immediate and long-term goals for the platform? How do you plan to expand the ecosystem? Or Perelman: For the next rest of the summer, we are refining some of our core components and completing the migration of our staking system from EVM to Chromia. From an ecosystem perspective, we have a very well developed gaming sector, and I think the most common perception of Chromia is that we are a ‘gaming chain’. While this is true, we are also a fully featured Layer-1 that can run all kinds of dapps. As the year progresses, we expect to see other areas like DeFi become more developed. Also, I can’t say too much but we are working on some new initiatives that will open up Chromia to a whole new range of use cases. Long-term, we are ambitious and plan to have a significant presence across multiple verticals. Or Perelman: Ishan Pandey: As a pioneer in relational blockchain technology, how do you see Chromia influencing the broader blockchain industry in coming years? Ishan Pandey: As a pioneer in relational blockchain technology, how do you see Chromia influencing the broader blockchain industry in coming years? Ishan Pandey: As a pioneer in relational blockchain technology, how do you see Chromia influencing the broader blockchain industry in coming years? Or Perelman: Most blockchains, regardless of their scalability, struggle with handling complex data sets. Relational blockchain aims to address this and could establish a new standard for blockchains. Chromia is designed to be interoperable with Ethereum and other EVM chains, allowing projects on other chains to utilize our unique features. As more projects and developers recognize the benefits, we anticipate an increase in the adoption of the relational model. Or Perelman: Ishan Pandey: Finally, where do you see the future of new technologies such as blockchain heading, and what strategies do you believe are crucial to promoting its widespread adoption? Ishan Pandey: Finally, where do you see the future of new technologies such as blockchain heading, and what strategies do you believe are crucial to promoting its widespread adoption? Ishan Pandey: Finally, where do you see the future of new technologies such as blockchain heading, and what strategies do you believe are crucial to promoting its widespread adoption? Or Perelman: I believe the most important step in promoting adoption is making blockchain more intuitive. This includes easier account handling, 'gas-free' transactions, and streamlining the onboarding process. While progress is being made, there's still a long way to go. At Chromia, we’re committed to contributing to this evolution and improving the user experience. Or Perelman: Don’t forget to like and share the story! Vested Interest Disclosure: This author is an independent contributor publishing via our business blogging program. HackerNoon has reviewed the report for quality, but the claims herein belong to the author. #DYOR. Vested Interest Disclosure: This author is an independent contributor publishing via our business blogging program . HackerNoon has reviewed the report for quality, but the claims herein belong to the author. #DYOR. Vested Interest Disclosure: business blogging program business blogging program

FEES

fees.worlden

-- employees

Since n.d.

COMPANY RANKING

FEES

EVERGREEN INDEX #5554

Representing this company? Click here to claim and customize this page!

fees WIKI

Apply to get your Tech Company News Page live on HackerNoon.com today!

FEES

fees.worlden

-- employees

Since n.d.

COMPANY RANKING

FEES

EVERGREEN INDEX #5554

RELATED COMPANIESRANK

STORIES ABOUT FEES

Representing this company? Click here to claim and customize this page!

fees WIKI

Apply to get your Tech Company News Page live on HackerNoon.com today!