BearPunks on Base Meet the BearPunks: Sweet pixel art bears coming to you as PFP art collection. For sure, you will love them, they are CC0 and inspired by Larva Labs CryptoPunks. BearPunks will join the CryptoTeddies ecosystem, both created by numo (@numo_0).

BearPunks - Collection | OpenSea

When the fate of Base is at stake, the only chance of survival are the Based Apes. A collection of 5,000 Futuristic Apes on Base, aiming to push the boundaries of Base for the better!

Based Apes - Collection | OpenSea

<strong>OpenSea</strong> is the world&#x27;s first and largest web3 marketplace for NFTs and crypto collectibles. Browse, create, buy, sell, and auction NFTs using <strong>OpenSea</strong> today.

BANGERS - Collection | OpenSea

Get the most recent info and news about Homo Spacien on HackerNoon, where 10k+ technologists publish stories for 4M+ monthly readers.

Homo Spaciens, developed by Vizzio Art Creators Lab (VACL), is a powerful, in-vogue NFT art collection around the recent space movement.

Our Homo Spacien collection parallels the scientific and physical influencers that will impact how humans look, dress, and interact with each other as we explore galactic environments, opening up conversations and reflection on space exploration.

The collection is a project conceptualised by VACL, a large group of artists, developers and crypto-enthusiasts, and the "female" Homo Spacien collection comes from a pool of 153 attributes and 13 different traits.

Homo Spacien

This 7-Step Framework Guided Me to $300K in Monthly Revenue

How to Choose the Right Laptop: A Step-by-Step Guide

Authors:
(1) Cody Rucker, Department of Computer Science, University of Oregon and Corresponding author;
(2) Brittany A. Erickson, Department of Computer Science, University of Oregon and Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oregon. Table of Links Abstract and 1. Context and Motivation Physics-Informed Deep Learning Framework
Learning Problems for Earthquakes on Rate-and-State Faults
2D Verification, Validation and Applications
Summary and Future Work and References Abstract Direct observations of earthquake nucleation and propagation are few and yet the next decade will likely see an unprecedented increase in indirect, surface observations that must be integrated into modeling efforts. Machine learning (ML) excels in the presence of large data and is an actively growing field in seismology. However, not all ML methods incorporate rigorous physics, and purely data-driven models can predict physically unrealistic outcomes due to observational bias or extrapolation. Our work focuses on the recently emergent Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN), which seamlessly integrates data while ensuring that model outcomes satisfy rigorous physical constraints. In this work we develop a multi-network PINN for both the forward problem as well as for direct inversion of nonlinear fault friction parameters, constrained by the physics of motion in the solid Earth, which have direct implications for assessing seismic hazard. We present the computational PINN framework for strike-slip faults in 1D and 2D subject to rate-and-state friction. Initial and boundary conditions define the data on which the PINN is trained. While the PINN is capable of approximating the solution to the governing equations to low-errors, our primary interest lies in the network’s capacity to infer friction parameters during the training loop. We find that the network for the parameter inversion at the fault performs much better than the network for material displacements to which it is coupled. Additional training iterations and model tuning resolves this discrepancy, enabling a robust surrogate model for solving both forward and inverse problems relevant to seismic faulting. Keywords: physics-informed neural network, rate-and-state friction, earthquake, inverse problem, fully dynamic 1. Context and Motivation Faults are home to a vast spectrum of event types, from slow aseismic creep, to slow-slip to megathrust earthquakes followed by postseismic afterslip. The Cascadia subduction zone in the Pacific Northwest, for example, hosts several types of slow earthquake processes including low (and very low) frequency earthquakes, non-volcanic tremor (NVT) and slow-slip events (SSE) [22], but also large, fast earthquakes, the last of which was a magnitude ∼9 in the year 1700 [1]. Understanding the physical mechanisms for such diversity of slip styles is crucial for mitigating the associated hazards but major uncertainties remain in the depth-dependency of frictional properties at fault zones, which affect fault locking and therefore rupture potential [3, 41]. Direct observations of earthquake nucleation and propagation are few and yet the next decade will likely see an unprecedented increase in indirect, surface observations that could be integrated into modeling efforts [2]. Traditional numerical approaches for solving the partial differential equations (PDE) governing earthquake processes (e.g. finite difference methods) have seen incredible growth in the past century, in particular in terms of convergence theory and high-performance computing. Traditional methods employ a mesh (either a finite number of grid points/nodes or elements) and a range of time-integration schemes in order to obtain an approximate solution whose accuracy depends directly on the mesh size (with error decreasing with decreasing node spacing or element size). This mesh dependency introduces limitations when high resolution is needed, and while traditional methods give rise to a forward problem, solving inverse problems require additional machinery and can be prohibitively expensive [27, 16]. In addition, noisy or sparse data cannot be seamlessly integrated into the computational framework of traditional methods. Machine learning (ML), on the other hand, excels in the presence of large data and is an actively growing field in seismology, with applications ranging from earthquake early warning (EEW) to ground-motion prediction [31]. However, not all ML methods incorporate rigorous physics, and purely data-driven models can predict physically unrealistic outcomes due to observational bias or extrapolation [53]. A new Deep Learning technique has recently emerged called the Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN), which seamlessly integrates sparse and/or noisy data while ensuring that model outcomes satisfy rigorous physical constraints. PINNs do not outperform traditional numerical methods for forward problems (except in high-dimensional settings) [26], but they offer advantages over traditional numerical methods in that both forward and inverse problems can be solved in the same computational framework. However, the majority of PINN applications are currently limited to simple mechanical models, forward problems and/or do not incorporate real-world observations [15, 42, 25]. Here we introduce a new, physically-rigorous modeling framework for both forward and inverse problems that can be integrated with observational data in order to better understand earthquake fault processes. This Deep Learning approach will vastly expand our computational abilities to explore and infer relevant parameter spaces responsible for slip complexity, and the conditions that enable the world’s largest earthquakes. Though the PINN framework lacks the robust error analysis that comes with traditional methods, a large number of publications have emerged since ∼2017 which aim to customize PINNs through the use of different activation functions, gradient optimization techniques, neural network architecture, and loss function structure [7]. Careful formulation of the loss function using the weak form of the PDE have been proposed for constructing deep learning analogues of Ritz [52] and Galerkin [28, 29, 23] methods which use numerical quadrature to reduce the order of the PDE resulting in a simpler learning problem [6, 14]. In tandem, statistical learning theory has been used to deduce global error bounds for PINNs in terms of optimization error, generalization error, and approximation error [32]. For wide but shallow networks utilizing hyperbolic tangent activation functions, the approximation error has been shown to be bounded over Sobolev spaces [9]. Bounds on PINN generalization error have been derived for linear second-order PDE [47] (later extended to all linear problems [48]) and some specific cases like Navier-Stokes [8]. Moreover, the abstract framework for PINNs can leverage stability of a PDE to provide conditions under which generalization error is small whenever training error is small for both forward and inverse problems [39, 38]. More recently, a PINN-specific optimization algorithm has achieved markedly improved accuracy over other optimization algorithms by incorporating a PDE energy into the backpropagation step [40]. In addition to this rapid framework development, PINNs have been shown to perform well on a variety of physical problems like Navier-Stokes [51, 49, 24], convection heat transfer [5], solid mechanics, [19, 18] and the Euler equations [35]. In this work we focus specifically on rate-and-state friction [e.g. 46], an experimentally-motivated, nonlinear friction law capable of reproducing a wide range of observed earthquake behaviors and is used in nearly all modern dynamic rupture and earthquake cycle simulations [20, 12]. A better understanding of the depth-dependency of rate-and-state parameters - which have a direct correlation to fault locking and seismic rupture potential – is a fundamental task [3, 41]. To address this task we develop a multi-network PINN for modeling a vertical, strike-slip frictional fault embedded in an elastic half-space, and consider deformation in both 1D and 2D. The paper is organized as follows: In section 2 we first provide an overview of the physics-informed deep learning framework and PINN architecture for general initial-boundary-value problems, in order to best describe the implementation to our application problem. In section 3 we provide specific details of the PINN framework applied problems, first illustrated in 1D with an example forward problem, then further developed to include inverse problems in 2D. In section 4 we report details of our optimal network architecture and training methods, verifying our methods with a manufactured solution to ensure accuracy of our inversions. We conclude with a summary and discussion of future work in section 5. This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY 4.0 DEED license. Authors: (1) Cody Rucker, Department of Computer Science, University of Oregon and Corresponding author; (2) Brittany A. Erickson, Department of Computer Science, University of Oregon and Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oregon. Authors: Authors: (1) Cody Rucker, Department of Computer Science, University of Oregon and Corresponding author; (2) Brittany A. Erickson, Department of Computer Science, University of Oregon and Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oregon. Table of Links Abstract and 1. Context and Motivation Abstract and 1. Context and Motivation Physics-Informed Deep Learning Framework Learning Problems for Earthquakes on Rate-and-State Faults 2D Verification, Validation and Applications Summary and Future Work and References Physics-Informed Deep Learning Framework Physics-Informed Deep Learning Framework Learning Problems for Earthquakes on Rate-and-State Faults Learning Problems for Earthquakes on Rate-and-State Faults 2D Verification, Validation and Applications 2D Verification, Validation and Applications Summary and Future Work and References Summary and Future Work and References Abstract Direct observations of earthquake nucleation and propagation are few and yet the next decade will likely see an unprecedented increase in indirect, surface observations that must be integrated into modeling efforts. Machine learning (ML) excels in the presence of large data and is an actively growing field in seismology. However, not all ML methods incorporate rigorous physics, and purely data-driven models can predict physically unrealistic outcomes due to observational bias or extrapolation. Our work focuses on the recently emergent Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN), which seamlessly integrates data while ensuring that model outcomes satisfy rigorous physical constraints. In this work we develop a multi-network PINN for both the forward problem as well as for direct inversion of nonlinear fault friction parameters, constrained by the physics of motion in the solid Earth, which have direct implications for assessing seismic hazard. We present the computational PINN framework for strike-slip faults in 1D and 2D subject to rate-and-state friction. Initial and boundary conditions define the data on which the PINN is trained. While the PINN is capable of approximating the solution to the governing equations to low-errors, our primary interest lies in the network’s capacity to infer friction parameters during the training loop. We find that the network for the parameter inversion at the fault performs much better than the network for material displacements to which it is coupled. Additional training iterations and model tuning resolves this discrepancy, enabling a robust surrogate model for solving both forward and inverse problems relevant to seismic faulting. Keywords : physics-informed neural network, rate-and-state friction, earthquake, inverse problem, fully dynamic Keywords 1. Context and Motivation Faults are home to a vast spectrum of event types, from slow aseismic creep, to slow-slip to megathrust earthquakes followed by postseismic afterslip. The Cascadia subduction zone in the Pacific Northwest, for example, hosts several types of slow earthquake processes including low (and very low) frequency earthquakes, non-volcanic tremor (NVT) and slow-slip events (SSE) [22], but also large, fast earthquakes, the last of which was a magnitude ∼9 in the year 1700 [1]. Understanding the physical mechanisms for such diversity of slip styles is crucial for mitigating the associated hazards but major uncertainties remain in the depth-dependency of frictional properties at fault zones, which affect fault locking and therefore rupture potential [3, 41]. Direct observations of earthquake nucleation and propagation are few and yet the next decade will likely see an unprecedented increase in indirect, surface observations that could be integrated into modeling efforts [2]. Traditional numerical approaches for solving the partial differential equations (PDE) governing earthquake processes (e.g. finite difference methods) have seen incredible growth in the past century, in particular in terms of convergence theory and high-performance computing. Traditional methods employ a mesh (either a finite number of grid points/nodes or elements) and a range of time-integration schemes in order to obtain an approximate solution whose accuracy depends directly on the mesh size (with error decreasing with decreasing node spacing or element size). This mesh dependency introduces limitations when high resolution is needed, and while traditional methods give rise to a forward problem, solving inverse problems require additional machinery and can be prohibitively expensive [27, 16]. In addition, noisy or sparse data cannot be seamlessly integrated into the computational framework of traditional methods. Machine learning (ML), on the other hand, excels in the presence of large data and is an actively growing field in seismology, with applications ranging from earthquake early warning (EEW) to ground-motion prediction [31]. However, not all ML methods incorporate rigorous physics, and purely data-driven models can predict physically unrealistic outcomes due to observational bias or extrapolation [53]. A new Deep Learning technique has recently emerged called the Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN), which seamlessly integrates sparse and/or noisy data while ensuring that model outcomes satisfy rigorous physical constraints. PINNs do not outperform traditional numerical methods for forward problems (except in high-dimensional settings) [26], but they offer advantages over traditional numerical methods in that both forward and inverse problems can be solved in the same computational framework. However, the majority of PINN applications are currently limited to simple mechanical models, forward problems and/or do not incorporate real-world observations [15, 42, 25]. Here we introduce a new, physically-rigorous modeling framework for both forward and inverse problems that can be integrated with observational data in order to better understand earthquake fault processes. This Deep Learning approach will vastly expand our computational abilities to explore and infer relevant parameter spaces responsible for slip complexity, and the conditions that enable the world’s largest earthquakes. Though the PINN framework lacks the robust error analysis that comes with traditional methods, a large number of publications have emerged since ∼2017 which aim to customize PINNs through the use of different activation functions, gradient optimization techniques, neural network architecture, and loss function structure [7]. Careful formulation of the loss function using the weak form of the PDE have been proposed for constructing deep learning analogues of Ritz [52] and Galerkin [28, 29, 23] methods which use numerical quadrature to reduce the order of the PDE resulting in a simpler learning problem [6, 14]. In tandem, statistical learning theory has been used to deduce global error bounds for PINNs in terms of optimization error, generalization error, and approximation error [32]. For wide but shallow networks utilizing hyperbolic tangent activation functions, the approximation error has been shown to be bounded over Sobolev spaces [9]. Bounds on PINN generalization error have been derived for linear second-order PDE [47] (later extended to all linear problems [48]) and some specific cases like Navier-Stokes [8]. Moreover, the abstract framework for PINNs can leverage stability of a PDE to provide conditions under which generalization error is small whenever training error is small for both forward and inverse problems [39, 38]. More recently, a PINN-specific optimization algorithm has achieved markedly improved accuracy over other optimization algorithms by incorporating a PDE energy into the backpropagation step [40]. In addition to this rapid framework development, PINNs have been shown to perform well on a variety of physical problems like Navier-Stokes [51, 49, 24], convection heat transfer [5], solid mechanics, [19, 18] and the Euler equations [35]. In this work we focus specifically on rate-and-state friction [e.g. 46], an experimentally-motivated, nonlinear friction law capable of reproducing a wide range of observed earthquake behaviors and is used in nearly all modern dynamic rupture and earthquake cycle simulations [20, 12]. A better understanding of the depth-dependency of rate-and-state parameters - which have a direct correlation to fault locking and seismic rupture potential – is a fundamental task [3, 41]. To address this task we develop a multi-network PINN for modeling a vertical, strike-slip frictional fault embedded in an elastic half-space, and consider deformation in both 1D and 2D. The paper is organized as follows: In section 2 we first provide an overview of the physics-informed deep learning framework and PINN architecture for general initial-boundary-value problems, in order to best describe the implementation to our application problem. In section 3 we provide specific details of the PINN framework applied problems, first illustrated in 1D with an example forward problem, then further developed to include inverse problems in 2D. In section 4 we report details of our optimal network architecture and training methods, verifying our methods with a manufactured solution to ensure accuracy of our inversions. We conclude with a summary and discussion of future work in section 5. This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY 4.0 DEED license. This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY 4.0 DEED license. available on arxiv

Integrating Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Earthquake Modeling: Abstract, Context, Motivation

How to Build a Chatbot with Langchain, Next.js, OpenAI, and Supabase

Quality-Diversity through AI Feedback: Appendix

BUSINESS LETTERS

In this day and age, we are used to digital experiences that enhance our daily lives. From user-friendly apps to interactive websites, we've come to expect products that not only serve a purpose but also provide an enjoyable and familiar journey. However, it's no secret that not all digital encounters meet these expectations. Some leave us frustrated with their inconsistent or unfamiliar visual styles, while others lack any visual style at all, making them feel bland and; Quite frankly? Boring. Ok, let’s pause for a moment, think about the last time you used an app or visited a website that made you wonder if you had accidentally stumbled into an entirely different platform. Buttons seemed to change colors, fonts appeared randomly altered, and spacing between elements seemed to have a mind of its own. Chances are, you were experiencing the consequences of a poorly managed design system. Imagine your favorite recipe for a mouthwatering dish. Each ingredient plays a crucial role in enhancing the flavors and creating a delightful culinary journey. Similarly, a design system works in a comparable manner, seamlessly blending design and engineering to craft a harmonious user experience. Yet, achieving this harmony isn't always easy, especially when designers and developers speak different languages. Designers care deeply about visual aesthetics, while developers are focused on the technical implementation. This is where the term comes in. while creating consistent and enjoyable digital products. Design tokens serve as a common language that both designers and developers can understand and use to maintain a shared design system. They act as the building blocks of visual design decisions, such as colors, typography, spacing, and more. Design Token The secret ingredient to bridging the gap between design and engineering So, how can design tokens transform a product from a chaotic mess into a user-friendly masterpiece? Let's take a closer look. Deep Dive Consistency and Familiarity Design tokens bring consistency to the table, ensuring that apps or websites maintain unified visual styles across all its elements. From the vibrant colors that match a brand to the perfect typography that strikes the right tone, design tokens lay down the rules for the appearance of digital products. This consistency helps users feel at home, navigating effortlessly and trusting the platform. Faster design iterations Picture this: your team decides to update the primary color of your brand. With design tokens, you can make this change in a single place, and voila! The entire product seamlessly adopts the new color. No more hunting down every occurrence of the old color across the codebase or design files. Design tokens empower product teams to maintain the design system with ease. Reducing Technical Debt A chaotic product with inconsistent design elements is challenging to maintain and update. By utilizing design tokens, the product becomes more maintainable, as changes to design elements are centralized and easily controlled. This, in turn, reduces technical debt and streamlines future development efforts. Simplifying collaboration With Design Tokens, designers and developers no longer speak different languages and can finally be on the same page. Through collaborative efforts, they define and refine the design system, each bringing their expertise to the table. Designers can define the design tokens, while developers implement them in the codebase, resulting in a harmonious relationship between design and engineering teams. This newfound synergy leads to stronger, more enjoyable products. : Enabling Reusability Design tokens promote the creation of reusable design components. Once a design component is defined and styled using design tokens, it can be reused throughout the product and even across different projects. This reusability not only saves time and effort but also ensures design consistency across the entire ecosystem. : Enhancing User Trust A consistent and cohesive user interface builds trust with users. Design tokens help create a sense of reliability and professionalism, making users feel comfortable navigating the product. The result is improved user satisfaction and increased user loyalty. Real example Ok enough words, here’s a visual example: In the above example, Designers create a set of defined color tokens. The base color shown in the base hex value . The token alias which references the base color, The token alias which references the brand color, and the token alias which references the hex value with a 20% opacity. #00FF84 Colors/Brand Button/Primary/Color Badge/Active/Border From design POV Any components from the design side can consume those variables by using Figma. From engineering POV Engineering teams can leverage tools like with to automatically  sync variables and styles created from Figma into their codebase while being able to track versions when the change happened. Tokens Studio Styledictionary /* CSS */
:root {
  --base: 151, 100%, 50%; /* HSL equivalent of #00FF84 */
  --colors-brand: hsl(var(--base));
  --colors-button-primary: var(--colors-brand);
  --badge-active-border: hsla(var(--base), .2);
} Wrapping Up Design tokens can bridge the gap between design and engineering by providing a single source of truth for visual style. This means that designers and engineers can work together more effectively, as they are both working with the same data. The ultimate goal is to enhance the time to live process of a product while ensuring that the visual style of a product is consistent across all platforms and devices. Resources Guide to variables Figma Comprehensive guide to design systems Design Systems Handbook Figma intro to variables Creating variables (Tokens Studio) I’m always open to meet new people so feel free to contact me on X Thanks for reading! Also published . here

HOMO SPACIEN

opensea.io

1-10 employees

Since 2021

COMPANY RANKING

HOMO SPACIEN

EVERGREEN INDEX #1250

Representing this company? Click here to claim and customize this page!

Homo Spacien WIKI

Apply to get your Tech Company News Page live on HackerNoon.com today!

HOMO SPACIEN

opensea.io

1-10 employees

Since 2021

COMPANY RANKING

HOMO SPACIEN

EVERGREEN INDEX #1250

RELATED COMPANIESRANK

STORIES ABOUT HOMO SPACIEN

Representing this company? Click here to claim and customize this page!

Homo Spacien WIKI

Apply to get your Tech Company News Page live on HackerNoon.com today!